The first thing that came to mind
when I was assigned this blog post was the issue of climate change. I thought
to myself: what environmental issue would be easiest to research? Climate
change that is. So I took to the Internet, and I googled “#Climate2014.” To my
surprise, one of the first search options linked to an article titled “Women
and #Climate2014.” I took a moment and
thought to myself, how on earth can you combine the issues of women’s rights
and climate change? However, after taking a closer look at the article, it made
complete sense. The article is not classically formatted; instead it is a
collection of social media tweets and videos. After reading the tweets and
watching the videos, I now see that the women’s rights movement and climate
change have a lot in common.
First of
all these two issues are extremely salient. If you are a human being living in
the 21st Century than you have been touched in some way by both issues.
You have either heard of the polar caps melting or heard about the injustice
that women are facing each day. Apart from their salience, both issues are also
extremely controversial. As obviously true and relevant these two issues are to
our modern and global society, people still choose to be ignorant and claim
that neither issue actually exists. Or,
people do acknowledge that they exist, but just choose to be ignorant.
In my
individual opinion, I believe that people are struggling to grapple with these
two issues because they both lack strong regimes. However, especially for the
women’s rights movement, groups and individuals behind both of these issues are
working to create strong regimes that can develop and enact actually domestic
and global policy changes.
In class we discussed that climate
change is a global issue in the sense that it is a global common, trans-boundary
externality, and a linked issue. Climate change is a global commons issue
because it is an issue that relates to physical and biological systems that lie
outside the jurisdiction of any individual state or region. It is also a linked
issue because it is greatly impacted by consequences from other policies that
are not directly related to the environment. Climate change is also an issue of
trans-boundary externality because one state’s environment can be impacted by
another state’s policies or actions.
I believe that women’s rights can
also be categorized as a linked issue, trans-boundary externality, and global
commons. It is a linked issue because particular policies or decisions such as
the Supreme Court decision of Hobby Lobby undeniably had unintended
consequences on women’s rights. The concept of women’s rights can also be
regarded as a trans-boundary externality because if one woman suffers in a
developing nation than women in developed nations are affected as well. As the
women’s rights movement grows, more and more women are standing in solidarity. For
example, I genuinely care about the lives of women in the developing world.
There is no reason why they do not deserve the same rights as I do. I genuinely
feel less of a person, when I hear about women in other countries loosing their
rights. While the idea that women’s rights can be regarded as a global commons
may be far fetched, bear with me as I try to make the comparison. While many
organizations and institutions try to treat women as objects, they are not.
Women belong to no one and yet states continually try to create laws that make
them into objects.
If people want to make serious
changes and developments in the areas of climate change and women’s rights then
stronger regimes must be created. Just like the Sea Shepherds used ethos to
spread the word about saving the whales, nongovernmental and intergovernmental
organizations must use ethos in relation to climate change and women’s rights.
The women’s rights movement is currently making strides to impact state and
private sector policy. For example, the United Nations is putting familiar
faces to spread the necessity of feminism and women’s rights. Just last week
popular actress Emma Watson gave a speech through the UN on women’s
rights. Climate change is also using
celebrities to spread the word, just a couple of days ago Leonardo Dicaprio
gave a speech on climate change.
Putting popular faces to these
issues, allows these issues to become relatable. If a young Harry Potter fan
sees his favorite actress advocating for women’s rights, then he will become
more aware of what he does and what values he supports. When NGOs and IGOs affect and change the
values of people, then people will change they way the act.
They will stop buying products that
hurt the environment when they are produced. They will stop shopping at stores
that do not value women’s rights. The key is getting ordinary people all over
the world—in developed and developing nations— involved to make a difference. Ordinary
people will affect corporations and in turn the corruptions will affect
international states that finally have the ability to change and develop
policies.
The article, “Women and
#Climate2014,” focused on the social media conversation behind the United
Nations Climate Summit. Tweets from many NGOs and IGOs are documented. For
example one tweet from the United Nations states, “Women are the first and last
line of defense when it comes to climate issues.” I completely agree with this,
because if women are given more option and educations then they can take on
important roles. By given more important roles then women have the change to
become active members in their society. When women become active members of society,
then states’ economies will grow. If economies grow then people will have the
luxury to worry about climate change and develop concrete solutions.
Wedo Worldwide tweeted, “Just
transition must build gender into design. Formalize jobs to ensure rights,
benefits 4 women #Climate2014, health & jobs.”
The Elders tweeted, “If we take
away the barriers to women’s access to power we’d solve #climatechange much
faster!”
These tweets are just some of the
many that explain whey women’s rights and climate change are strongly related.
They are two of the most relevant and defining issues of the 21st
Century. As Hilary Clinton once said,
“Women’s rights are human rights.” I have to agree with Ms. Clinton, and I
would also like to take her point further to incorporate climate change.
If we take climate change seriously
and make strides toward solutions and energy reductions then we will create a
healthy and prosperous environment for our future children. If the earth is in
good shape for our children, then they will be able to focus on nourishing
human rights. People, especially women in this case, deserve to live in a world
were they do not have to worry about their own individual rights and the
environment. States and corporations
need to put away their differences and use their common sense to create a
global society in which all people can live safely and happily. If people are
content with their lives then more people will work to create innovative
technologies that will further advance and progress our global society.
Very interesting topic and angle. I must say that referring to women's rights (or women in general) as a commons problem brings to mind the idea of women being something that all non-women must share before it/they are used up. I get your point that human rights cross boundaries but do you think there is an alternate way of framing this that still gets to that point?
ReplyDeleteI definitely understand that considering women, in general, as a commons problem is farfetched. In my opinion, many governments - especially those of less developed states - do not always regard women as human beings. Many governments create laws and policies or spend years debating on what a woman can do to her body - by doing this, these governments strip women of their dignity and treat women as objects rather than human beings. Obviously women are not public goods that may be used up, but policy and laws that relate to women are argued on as if women are objects that cannot think for themselves. Just like the earth itself in regards to climate change, women have a difficult time being heard on the international stage. States are extremely selfish and noncompliant when it comes to creating policies that could benefit the earth and women.
ReplyDeleteThis was a very innovative way to look at the issue of women's rights. I think there is hope in the UN and Hillary Clinton declaring women's rights as a human rights issue, and many international organizations link sustainable development with giving women opportunities for business, education, and family planning. However, as you point out, real change occurs at the local and domestic level. Must there be other organizations in developing countries to ensure the fair treatment of women and compliance with UN mandates?
ReplyDeleteYea, women's rights - just like climate change - is both an international and domestic issue. However, before it can be successfully dealt with on the international level it needs to be dealt with on a domestic level. In my opinion the best way to promote women's rights and climate change on a domestic level is through NGOs and interest groups that can directly impact state and private sector policies. NGOs and interest groups need to educate the public - on the local level - on what exactly women's rights and climate change are. I think people have a difficult time constructing educated opinions on these two matters, because they are not discussed well on the domestic level.
ReplyDeleteAlso, UN Women is doing a great job educating people on women's rights on the international level. It would be great if we had something like it on the domestic level.